AI SUBMITTAL REVIEW

Review submittals in minutes, not days.

Upload your own project spec books, and SpecSure reviews every submittal against them — every requirement checked, every finding summarized and linked to the exact section. Reviews that took days take minutes — whether you’re reviewing submittals or preparing them.

Upload your own project spec books
10× faster first-pass review
Every finding cited to spec
PDF + Excel export
COMPLIANCE REPORT
SUBMITTAL 03 30 00-01
Cast-in-Place Concrete — 4000 PSI Mix
92
Substantially compliant
2 items to confirm
Meets 28-day strength & 0.45 w/c ratio §2.3
Fly ash at 25% exceeds 20% cap §2.3.B
Admixture not on approved list §2.4
CHECKS AGAINST THE SPEC BOOK YOU UPLOAD — PLUS STANDARDS LIKE: CSI MasterFormatACIAISCASTMASHRAENEC
THE PROBLEM

Submittal rejections quietly drain every project.

1 in 3
submittals is rejected on the first review
~$800
in rework for every rejected submittal
Weeks
added to the schedule each time one bounces back

SpecSure catches these issues before a package is ever sent.Figures are industry estimates from published construction submittal-review research.

HOW IT WORKS

From spec book to cited report in three steps.

01

Drop in specs + submittals

Upload the project spec book and the submittals you need reviewed. No tagging, no setup, no template wrangling.

02

SpecSure reads & cross-checks

It reads each submittal against the relevant spec sections and reasons about where they align, fall short, or warrant a closer look.

03

Get a cited report

Download a clean PDF or Excel — auto-named, cover-sheet aware, and ready to forward to your engineer for the official review.

Book a demoSee a sample report
THE OUTPUT

A report that’s already done the reading.

Every requirement checked, every exception flagged, every finding linked to the exact spec section — so whoever opens it can decide in minutes instead of digging through the book line by line.

SUBMITTAL 03 30 00-01 · REVIEWED JUN 12, 2026
Cast-in-Place Concrete — 4000 PSI Mix Design
§ 03 30 00 — Cast-in-Place Concrete · Part 2.3 Concrete Mixtures
COMPLIANCE SCORE
92/100
Substantially compliant
COMPLIANCE NARRATIVE

WHERE IT ALIGNS
FLAGS TO CONFIRM
REFERENCES: Project Spec 03 30 00 §2.3–2.4 · ACI 318 · ACI 306
↓ PDF ↓ Excel
Book a demoSee a sample report
WHO IT'S FOR

Built for both sides of the submittal.

IF YOU REVIEW SUBMITTALS

Make the call in minutes.

Skip the line-by-line read. SpecSure hands you a cited brief with every deviation already flagged — so you can approve, reject, or request revisions with confidence, fast.

IF YOU PREPARE SUBMITTALS

Get it approved the first time.

Check your package against the spec before you send it. Catch the gaps a reviewer would flag, fix them up front, and stop the costly back-and-forth.

Book a demoSee a sample report
FEATURES

Engineered for the way submittals actually move.

§

Cited to the spec

Every verdict points to the exact section, part, and paragraph. No black box, no guessing.

Deductive flags

Goes beyond keyword matching to surface schedule, substitution, and constructability risks the spec implies.

PDF + Excel export

One click produces a report your engineer can open and act on anywhere.

Smart naming & cover sheets

Reads the cover sheet to name the file — or names it from the material itself when there isn't one.

Spec-aware, every time

Ingests the full project spec book so each review reflects your project — not a generic standard.

Two output modes

A scored report for PMs, a no-score alignment brief for the engineers doing the official review.

THE PAYOFF

See what slow reviews cost you.

REWORK COST TODAY
$0
WITH SPECSURE (PROJECTED)
$0
ANNUAL SAVINGS (TODAY − PROJECTED)
$0

Adjust the numbers to your projects. Savings are a gross estimate, before SpecSure’s own cost — your engineer of record always makes the official call.

Where does the ~$800 rework figure come from?

It’s an industry estimate — not a SpecSure claim — and the field above is fully editable, so you can set it to your own number. A rejected submittal doesn’t just cost a “no”: it kicks off a re-review by the design team, a corrected resubmission by the subcontractor, and coordination back and forth in between. When you add up the skilled hours that touch a single rejection — the reviewer, the PM, and the sub preparing the package — plus the logging and admin overhead, published construction-submittal research puts the all-in cost of one rejection in the ballpark of $800. Your real figure depends on your team’s rates and process, so treat it as a starting point and adjust to fit your projects.

FAQ

Questions teams ask first.

Does SpecSure replace the engineer’s review?

No. SpecSure handles the first pass — it reads each submittal against your spec book, checks every requirement, and summarizes the findings with citations. The official determination always stays with the engineer of record.

How does it stay accurate?

Every finding links to the exact spec section it came from, so you can verify each one in a click instead of taking it on faith. SpecSure surfaces and cites; you decide.

What can it review?

Submittals against your project’s specification book — product data, shop drawings, samples, and more — across CSI MasterFormat divisions.

What do I get back?

A clean, cited report — PDF or Excel — ready to forward, with every requirement checked and every exception flagged.

Is my project data private?

Yes. Your specs and submittals stay private to your account and are used only to produce your reports.

Stop reading submittals line by line.

Start with a free pilot — bring your five toughest submittals and see SpecSure’s cited report side by side with your own review.

No commitment · Every finding cited to your spec · The engineer of record always makes the final call.